S tar Wars fans might recall Obi-Wan’s Jedi mind trick in A New Hope when he tells stormtroopers, “These aren’t the droids you’re looking for.” Were Star Wars writers wrong about the placement of the preposition “for”? Should Obi-Wan instead have said, “These aren’t the droids for which you’re looking”? The latter sounds unnatural (and much more Yoda-esque, to be honest). Situations like these have caused grammar reformers to question or outright rebel against this “rule” about not ending sentences with prepositions.

Prepositions explain one noun’s relation to another, often indicating where or when. They can tell you if a cat is above, below, beside, or under the bed, and they also indicate if the cat hid there before, during, or after dinner. Some argue against ending a sentence with a preposition because it indicates a relationship between two words. They reason that a sentence might seem unfinished if a second noun isn’t included after the preposition. However, ending a sentence with a preposition isn’t the grave grammar mistake that some make it out to be.

Consider this sentence: “The vase was on the table until the cat knocked it off.” Ending with the preposition “off” sounds natural. By the same token, “That’s what I’m talking about” sounds better than “That’s about which I’m talking,” and the structure of “I have no eggs to bake with” is more common than “I have no eggs with which to bake.” As you can see, context and structure matter. 

You might also enjoy

Grammar

5 Outdated Grammar Rules To Break

Grammar

Is It OK To Start a Sentence With a Conjunction?

However, just because it isn’t wrong doesn’t mean it’s always right. Sometimes, that ending preposition is redundant. Asking a friend, “Where are you at?” or “Where are you going to?” falls into this trap with unnecessary prepositions. “Where are you?” and “Where are you going?” are complete questions. To avoid this mistake, try removing the end preposition and see if the sentence still makes sense. 

To give some context, the argument for the rule dates back to the 17th century. Grammarians tried to instill Latin preposition placement rules into English, resulting in some believing these were hard-and-fast English rules. In modern English, preposition placement comes down to writing style — there’s no need to adhere to an arbitrary centuries-old rule. Today, most grammar guides and syntax experts agree that ending a sentence with a preposition is OK if it sounds natural and doesn’t break any true grammar rules.

33 LIKES

Share

Share to email Share to X Share to Pinterest Share link

Rachel Gresh

Freelance Writer

Rachel is a Washington, D.C.-based freelance writer. When she's not writing, you can find her wandering through a museum, exploring a new city, or advocating the importance of the Oxford comma.

Suggested Reads

Grammar

Good Tidings and Feliz Navidad: The Origins of Holiday Phrases

Language

Why Is “OK” a Presidential Abbreviation?

Vocabulary

Beyond “Dickensian”: 7 Quirky Words Created by Charles Dickens

Language

What’s the Difference Between “Famous” and “Infamous”?

Vocabulary

What’s a Tannenbaum? A Guide to Puzzling Christmas Carol Terms

Language

What’s the Plural of “Octopus”?

In 1905, a great punctuation war was sparked when Horace Hart, main editor and printer at the Oxford University Press, published for the first time what would become known as the “Oxford comma.” This punctuation mark, also called a “serial comma,” a “Harvard comma,” or to some, an unnecessary comma, comes after the penultimate (next-to-last) item in a list, followed by the conjunction “and” or “or.”

In the sentence “Her favorite types of tea are peppermint, chamomile, and oolong,” the Oxford comma comes right after “chamomile.” However, omitting that final comma — “Her favorite types of tea are peppermint, chamomile and oolong” — is also correct. Those who omit the comma believe it’s superfluous because it comes before a conjunction separating the last word in the list. Grammatically, neither side of the serial comma debate is wrong. You can use it or skip it; it’s a matter of personal style. Just be consistent throughout the piece. However, you might have to set personal preference aside if you follow a specific set of writing rules. For example, the AP Stylebook discourages using the Oxford comma in simple lists, while the MLA Style Manual, The Chicago Manual of Style, and APA Style champion the Oxford comma. Of course, the Oxford University Press style guide (also called New Hart’s Rules) and Harvard University Press retain the comma, which is where its aliases came from.

In what might be one of the greatest grammar paradoxes in history, the University of Oxford Style Guide, which differs from New Hart’s Rules, discourages using the Oxford comma in most situations. This instruction is straight from its style guide: “Note that there is no comma between the penultimate item in a list and ‘and’/‘or’, unless required to prevent ambiguity.”

You might also enjoy

Grammar

Obscure Punctuation Marks We Want To Bring Back

Grammar

4 Important Ways To Use a Semicolon

There are certainly instances where an Oxford comma can prevent ambiguity. Consider: “We invited the kids, Mary and William.” This can be interpreted in two ways. It could mean that the kids, whose names are Mary and William, were invited, or it could mean that the kids were invited, along with two other people named Mary and William. If you meant the latter, you might add an Oxford comma: “We invited the kids, Mary, and William.”

The Oxford comma debate remains an enduring tradition between passionate supporters and adversaries. You might even see “Has opinions on the Oxford comma” on the profile of someone who wishes to convey a level of nerd chic on their dating app profile. While we stand on the side of the Oxford comma at Word Smarts, our best advice is to embrace your personal preference unless otherwise directed by a style guide.

57 LIKES

Share

Share to email Share to X Share to Pinterest Share link

Rachel Gresh

Freelance Writer

Rachel is a Washington, D.C.-based freelance writer. When she's not writing, you can find her wandering through a museum, exploring a new city, or advocating the importance of the Oxford comma.

Suggested Reads

Grammar

Good Tidings and Feliz Navidad: The Origins of Holiday Phrases

Language

Why Is “OK” a Presidential Abbreviation?

Vocabulary

Beyond “Dickensian”: 7 Quirky Words Created by Charles Dickens

Language

What’s the Difference Between “Famous” and “Infamous”?

Vocabulary

What’s a Tannenbaum? A Guide to Puzzling Christmas Carol Terms

Language

What’s the Plural of “Octopus”?

When trying to make sense of historical dialogues, I’m often struck by the elaborate language — superfluous words, archaic vocabulary, and formal tones. While not quite a historical reproduction, the modern hip-hop musical Hamilton gave us some memorable tongue-twisting lines: “If it takes fighting a war for us to meet, it will have been worth it.” Here, “will have been” is in the future perfect tense. While the phrasing could be reduced to the simple past tense — “If it takes fighting a war for us to meet, it was worth it” — the rhythm of the future perfect tense adds a layer of emphasis and interest that captures more audience attention as Alexander Hamilton meets Eliza.

Let’s decode an even more intricate verb tense: the future perfect continuous in the passive voice. (According to one grammarian, this is the most rarely used verb tense in English.) Transforming Hamilton’s words to this tense results in: “If it takes fighting a war for us to meet, it will have been being made worth it.” This construction is not only a mouthful, but it’s nonsensical in this usage. The verb tense is not ignored because it’s complicated to say; it’s just useful only in certain contexts. 

The future perfect continuous passive tense has useful, albeit limited, applications. It depicts an action that will have been ongoing by a specific point in the future. For example: “The magazine will have been being published for three years by next January.” Here, the emphasis is on the duration of the magazine’s publication, highlighting the action itself rather than who or what is performing it.

To construct a sentence in the future perfect continuous tense, you need three auxiliary verbs: “will have been.” To shift into the passive voice, add the verb “being,” followed by a past participle (an “-ed” verb), and a “by” phrase to indicate when the action will conclude. Here’s the general formula for this uncommon tense: subject + “will have been” + “being” + past participle + “by” phrase.

You might also enjoy

Grammar

How To Fix the Passive Voice

Grammar

Is It “Make Due” or “Make Do”?

Putting it all together looks like this: “The skyscraper will have been being constructed for a decade by this time next summer.” Alternatively, you can reposition the “by” phrase to the beginning: “By this time next summer, the skyscraper will have been being constructed for a decade.” On even rarer occasions, a “by” phrase isn’t needed: “Next year celebrates the 10th year that students will have been being trained at this center.”

This rare tense is undoubtedly long-winded and unwieldy, but it is a valid grammatical construct. That said, don’t feel pressured to use it in everyday conversation. Simpler alternatives often suffice, though examining the versatility of language can give us ideas for how to be better communicators. 

22 LIKES

Share

Share to email Share to X Share to Pinterest Share link

Rachel Gresh

Freelance Writer

Rachel is a Washington, D.C.-based freelance writer. When she's not writing, you can find her wandering through a museum, exploring a new city, or advocating the importance of the Oxford comma.

Suggested Reads

Grammar

Good Tidings and Feliz Navidad: The Origins of Holiday Phrases

Language

Why Is “OK” a Presidential Abbreviation?

Vocabulary

Beyond “Dickensian”: 7 Quirky Words Created by Charles Dickens

Language

What’s the Difference Between “Famous” and “Infamous”?

Vocabulary

What’s a Tannenbaum? A Guide to Puzzling Christmas Carol Terms

Language

What’s the Plural of “Octopus”?

Short answer: The correct phrase is “make do,” but “make due” is a common mistake. We’re a curious bunch, though, so let’s examine why.

This phrase combines the separate verbs “make,” meaning “to form (something) by putting parts together or combining substances; construct; create,” and “do,” meaning “to perform (an action, the precise nature of which is often unspecified).” When combined, “make do” means “to manage to get by,” whether that involves settling for less or improvising a different solution. If you add a hyphen, “make-do” can also be used as an adjective and a noun, as in “a make-do repair” or “the make-dos are working.” When the verb phrase originated in the early 19th century, it was sometimes said as “make it do,” as it appears in Charlotte Brontë’s Jane Eyre in 1847: “‘Oh, very well!’ returned Miss Temple; ‘we must make it do, Barbara, I suppose.’” 

The adjective and noun forms came later, with the noun form showing up at the end of the 19th century and the adjective in the 1920s. Rudyard Kipling wrote in “Tales of ‘The Trade’” in 1916: “The full tale of their improvisations and ‘make-do’s’ will probably never come to light.” 

Writing “make due” is not a misspelling, but rather a malapropism, which is a mistake when someone incorrectly uses a similar-sounding word or phrase. What makes this malapropism particularly difficult to understand is that “make due” is not completely incorrect. As an adjective, “due” can mean sufficient, as in “due process” or “due diligence.” And until the 1940s, “make due” was a commonly accepted phrase. 

You might also enjoy

Grammar

Is “With Regard” or “With Regards” Correct?

Vocabulary

Why Can't Something Be "Very Unique"?

However, “make do” won the test of time with the popularity of this saying: “Use it up, wear it out, make it do, or do without.” The quote has been attributed to President Calvin Coolidge, but its origin is uncertain. The sentiment certainly suited life during the Great Depression, when people had to make do. During World War II, the saying became a popular slogan in the U.S. and the U.K. as people were encouraged to ration food, gasoline, and other materials to support the war effort. The attitude also applied to the noun form of “make-do” as the term was extended into a longer phrase around WWII: “make-do-and-mend,” which implied there was a process of ongoing repair. A publication from 1947 includes a quote with the line, “This age of bits and pieces, queues, rationing, and make-do-and-mend.”

What I love about “make do” is that the phrase in itself is improvised. There wasn’t a word that described just what was needed, so it was invented by throwing together two verbs to create the verb we wanted. We do the best with what we have on hand. 

18 LIKES

Share

Share to email Share to X Share to Pinterest Share link

Samantha Abernethy

Freelance Writer

Samantha Abernethy is a freelancer in Chicago. When she isn't staring at a laptop, you can find her sniffing out the best coffee with her greyhound Ruby, or chasing her kids around the nearest library.

Suggested Reads

Grammar

Good Tidings and Feliz Navidad: The Origins of Holiday Phrases

Language

Why Is “OK” a Presidential Abbreviation?

Vocabulary

Beyond “Dickensian”: 7 Quirky Words Created by Charles Dickens

Language

What’s the Difference Between “Famous” and “Infamous”?

Vocabulary

What’s a Tannenbaum? A Guide to Puzzling Christmas Carol Terms

Language

What’s the Plural of “Octopus”?