Have you ever wondered what, if anything, your name says about you? While parents usually put a great deal of thought and care into choosing names for their babies, these are typically given without any input from the recipient. Therefore, it would be logical to think that, really, our names say very little about who we are as individuals. But that isn’t necessarily the case — our names might actually have some say in how others perceive us, at least initially. But why? Here’s a look at how, when it comes to names, some sonic signatures could influence first impressions and personality associations in thought-provoking ways.

In 1929, German American psychologist Wolfgang Köhler carried out an elegantly simple experiment. He showed test subjects two shapes: one rounded and cloudlike, the other sharp and spiky. He then asked them to assign one of the made-up names “takete” or “maluma” to each shape. He found that an overwhelming majority of people matched “maluma” with the rounded shape and “takete” with the angular one. The experiment revealed a strong link between meaningless speech sounds and geometrical shapes — the softer-sounding word was associated with the rounded shape, and the harsher-sounding word with the spiky shape.  

Later, in 2001, UCSD scholars V.S. Ramachandran and Edward Hubbard repeated the experiment. Using similar shapes to Köhler’s experiment, they gave people a simple task: “In Martian language, one of these two figures is a ‘bouba’ and the other is a ‘kiki,’ try to guess which is which.” A resounding 95% of people picked “bouba” for the smooth, rounded figure, and “kiki” for the spiky one. This became known as the bouba-kiki effect. The experiment was later carried out across different cultures and languages, with similar results.  

So what, exactly, is going on? It isn’t entirely clear why the phenomenon occurs, but Ramachandran and Hubbard believe it may be due to connections between the sensory and motor areas of the brain. In the experiment, the visual shape of the object — round or spiky — is linked to the shape that our lips make when we say that corresponding word, with “bouba” producing open and rounded lip shapes, and “kiki” narrow and wide. In general, the experiments revealed that people — through the physical experience of both saying and hearing sounds — tend to associate sharp words to spiky objects, and softer words with rounder objects. 

The bouba-kiki effect shows how nonwords such as “bouba,” “maluma,” “takete,” and “kiki” can be associated with certain shapes, but what does this mean for the most personal of words, our own names? Cognitive psychologist David Sidhu and psycholinguist Penny Pexman tackled this very question, and they found that sound symbolism is not limited to nonwords, and that the bouba-kiki effect could apply to recognizable given names as well as nonwords. 

According to Sidhu and Pexman, individuals do associate certain personality traits with first names, solely on the basis of the sounds the name contains. Using shapes similar to those used by Köhler, Ramachandran, and Hubbard, their study found that certain first names, such as Bob and Molly, were perceived as round, and others, such as Kirk and Kate, as spiky. A similar study was carried out in French, with similar results: a round-sounding Benoit versus a spiky Éric.

Talking to the BBC, David Sidhu explained how the sounds of given names are perceived: “Smoother-sounding names like Molly get associated with things like being more agreeable, more emotional, more conscientious, whereas the harsher, spikier-sounding names are thought of as being more extroverted.” Names that are rich in soft, rounded sounds — for example, Bobby, Emma, or Liam — tend to be associated with warmth, approachability, and gentleness. In contrast, names featuring harder consonants and sharper sounds — Kirk, Kate, Viktor — can be perceived as energetic, projecting qualities such as strength, competence, and decisiveness. 

Don’t start agonizing over your own name — or what to call your baby — just yet. Sidhu and Pexman tested whether any actual link exists between a person’s name and their personality, perhaps as a result of a round or spiky name influencing its owner. They found no such association. Their data suggests that a first name is highly unlikely to influence a person’s actual personality traits — at least not beyond any biases held by other people. 

You might also enjoy

Language

10 Most Popular First Names and Their Meanings

Language

Are You Mispronouncing the Names of These Famous Figures?

According to Sidhu, the way a name sounds can play a role when that’s all someone knows, much like in his and Pexman’s studies — and it can potentially affect people’s first impressions. “But as you start getting more information about the person,” he says, “then that actual information about the personality is probably going to override these biases.” Your name, therefore, is unlikely to shape your personality in any significant way — but the bouba-kiki effect does remind us that language and perception are deeply intertwined, and simple sounds can carry more weight than we typically recognize.

Have you ever said “Nice wheels!” to someone while complimenting their car? If you have, you’ve used a synecdoche (pronounced sih-NEK-duh-kee). This figure of speech is something that most of us use often, maybe even daily, but it’s not usually identified by name outside of an English or public-speaking class. Let’s explore one of rhetoric’s most underrated tricks.

A synecdoche is an expression that uses a part to stand for a whole. For instance, “wheels” represents a whole car — when praising someone’s “nice wheels,” you obviously aren’t complimenting only their tires. In the same way, the expression “mouths to feed” refers to hungry people, with “mouth” representing part of a whole person. “Faces in the crowd” and “hand in marriage” are other common examples of synecdoche  using body parts to replace people or a person.

A synecdoche also can be composed in reverse, using the whole to describe a part, as in “Kansas City won the 2025 Super Bowl.” Here, the name of the entire city is used to describe part of it: the football team.

Metonyms and synecdoches are closely related, but they’re not exactly the same. A metonym employs a word that is closely associated with a concept to stand in for it, such as “the crown” for the British monarchy or “the press” for journalists. This tool is less literal and more metaphorical.

You might also enjoy

Language

What Are Metonymy and Metalepsis?

Language

What Is a Metaphor Versus a Simile?

So, the next time you hear someone say, “All hands on deck!” or ask, “What’s the head count?” you’ll know a synecdoche is hard at work to add a little more flair into daily conversations.

Handwriting is one of our distinct biometric traits, just like our fingerprints, iris, face, voice, and gait — all of which, to varying degrees of reliability and uniqueness, can be used as physical identifiers. For at least a century, handwriting analysts have helped solve a wide variety of criminal cases by examining a suspect’s writing, normally by comparing and matching handwritten samples. And then there are graphologists, who take the examination of handwriting even further, seeing it as a direct expression of our personality. They look at various aspects of our handwriting — from the size of our letters to how we dot an “i” or cross a “t” — with each element potentially revealing a wealth of information, such as our confidence levels, emotional state, and even our general approach to life. 

Here we take a look at some of the key components that graphologists look for when examining handwriting, and what each element can say about us. It’s important to remember, however, that graphologists don’t normally focus on just a single, isolated symbol — it’s best to consider the various elements as a whole to get a bigger and potentially more accurate personality profile. 

Furthermore, graphology is not the precise study that handwriting analysis provides — take the assumptions about certain personality traits and their connection to handwriting with a grain of salt. Just because you form your letters in a certain way doesn’t mean you’re destined for a particular outcome. Instead, have some fun with the possibilities of graphology and what your handwriting might reveal.  

The amount of pen pressure a person uses when writing is a key indicator of emotion for graphologists. A writer using heavy pressure (meaning the imprints of their handwriting can be felt on the other side of the page) is thought to be displaying more emotional intensity. More generally, heavy pressure writers often have strong constitutions and enjoy being active but may also be temperamental or irritable. Soft pen pressure, on the other hand, can be indicative of a yielding, hesitant personality. According to an interview with graphologist Annette Poizner in Reader’s Digest, “This may be somebody who grew up with a dominant or aggressive caretaker or sibling and never learned how to be assertive.” 

The way you dot your lowercase “i” also can be particularly telling. A small, precise dot directly above the letter stem suggests someone who is detail-oriented, precise, and methodical. But if the writer replaces the standard dot with a round circle — or even a small smiley face — it’s a strong sign of playfulness (or a desire for attention). A hastily drawn dot that turns into a small, sharp line, on the other hand, could be a sign of irritation or anger.

A preference for strong angularity, similarly, may indicate irritability and anger-management issues, but also honed critical thinking and debating powers. On the other hand, the presence of loops and rounds can indicate a writer with a more expressive, emotional, or sensitive state of mind. 

The angle at which your letters lean can reveal whether you are an extrovert (right slant) or introvert (left slant), as can the size of your handwriting. Large, bold letters often belong to extroverts who enjoy being noticed and appreciated. These writers tend to be self-confident and may do well in leadership roles and social situations. Small writing often indicates the opposite — an introvert. According to graphologist John Beck, “The small writer by contrast does not like to be noticed, takes up an analytical attitude to everything, and likes to play a low social profile.” If your writing is medium-sized, it may represent a more balanced personality that can adapt well to different social situations.

Spacing comes into play, too. Generally speaking, the space between handwritten words tends to be about the width of one letter (a good rule of thumb being the width of a lowercase “o”). Gaps that are wider or narrower than normal can be revealing. Wide spacing may indicate that a person values their freedom highly, and particularly dislikes feeling overwhelmed or crowded. Narrow spacing suggests that the writer might crave contact with other people, doesn’t like being alone, and is possibly a bit needy.  

You might also enjoy

Language

What Happened to Teaching Cursive in School?

Language

Why Cursive Writing and Penmanship Is Important

Graphical continuity — the way in which letters connect with each other in each word — is one of the fundamentals in handwriting. As children, we are taught cursive (joined-up) handwriting and print handwriting. What we stick with as adults can reveal information about our way of thinking. People who connect their letters apply logic over emotion — and might also be more conformist, conventional, and predictable. Conversely, disconnected letters might suggest someone who thinks more intuitively or creatively, and acts more on instinct. These shunners of cursive might well prefer to work independently and may be naturally artistic or inventive.